Literature Review Synthesis

Synthesize a set of papers into themes, agreements, and genuine conflicts, with claims traced to sources and gaps named honestly.

Papers and sources to synthesize:
"""
[PASTE ABSTRACTS, FULL TEXTS, OR YOUR NOTES. LABEL EACH WITH AUTHOR, YEAR, AND TITLE.]
"""

Synthesize the sources above into a literature review.

My research question: [THE QUESTION]
Field and intended reader: [WHO WILL READ THIS AND WHAT THEY ALREADY KNOW]

Produce:

1. **Source table.** One row per source: citation, what it studied, method, sample or dataset size, main finding, and the limitation the authors themselves named. Where a field is not present in what I pasted, write "not stated" rather than inferring it.

2. **Themes.** Group the findings into 3-6 themes that answer the research question. For each theme: what the sources collectively support, and every claim tagged with the sources behind it. A theme resting on a single source must say so.

3. **Agreements and conflicts.** Where sources genuinely converge, and where they genuinely conflict. For each conflict, state whether it comes from a difference in method, population, definition, or time period, or whether it is a real empirical disagreement. Do not resolve a conflict by averaging it.

4. **Methodological quality.** Which findings rest on strong designs and which on small samples, single sites, or self-report. This is not a criticism of the authors; it is what tells the reader how much weight to put where.

5. **Gaps.** What the question needs that this set does not answer: populations not studied, methods not used, time periods not covered, questions not asked.

6. **The synthesis paragraph.** What can be said with confidence right now, in prose, with the uncertainty stated rather than hedged away.

Rules: use only the sources I provided. Do not add papers from memory, do not invent citations, findings, sample sizes, or years, and do not attribute a claim to a source that does not make it. If two sources use the same term to mean different things, that is a finding worth stating. Mark anything you inferred rather than read as [INFERRED].

How to use

Enforce the rule against adding papers from memory above everything else here. Fabricated citations are the best-documented failure mode in academic AI use, and they convince because the author names and journals are real even when the paper is not. Paste only sources you have actually read. Section 3 is where the intellectual work lives, since conflicts caused by different operational definitions look identical to real disagreements until someone checks.

More business prompts

Build me a monthly budget and a debt payoff plan from these numbers.

Take-home income per month: [AMOUNT, and note if it varies]
Fixed costs: [RENT/MORTGAGE, UTILITIES, INSURANCE, SUBSCRIPTIONS, TRANSPORT, CHILDCARE, with amounts]
Variable spending, last 3 months if known: [GROCERIES, DINING, SHOPPING, ETC.]
Debts: [FOR EACH: name, balan

Budget and Debt Payoff Plan

Turn your real income, bills, and debts into a monthly budget and a payoff schedule with the math shown and the tradeoffs named.

Businessbeginner

Build a 13-week cash flow forecast.

Cash on hand today: [AMOUNT, and which accounts]
Any restricted or committed cash: [AMOUNT AND WHAT IT IS FOR]

Expected inflows:
- Receivables outstanding: [CUSTOMER, AMOUNT, INVOICE DATE, TERMS, and how reliably each pays]
- Recurring revenue: [AMOUNT, BILLING DATE, CHURN ASSUMPTION]
- New sales expe

13-Week Cash Flow Forecast

Build the rolling weekly cash forecast operators actually run on: opening balance, timed inflows and outflows, and the week you run short.

Businessadvanced

Help me set pricing for [PRODUCT/SERVICE].

What it does and who buys it: [PRODUCT + BUYER]
The alternative if they do not buy: [COMPETITOR, IN-HOUSE, SPREADSHEET, DOING NOTHING]
What that alternative costs them: [MONEY, TIME, RISK. Estimate if needed and say so.]
Value we create, quantified if possible: [TIME SAVED, REVENUE GAINED, COST

Pricing Strategy

Work out what to charge and how to package it: value basis, tier structure, the metric you meter on, and how to test before committing.