# Project: [APP NAME]

[One sentence: what this app is and who uses it.]

## Commands
- Dev server: `pnpm dev`
- Type check: `pnpm typecheck`
- Tests: `pnpm test` (single file: `pnpm test path/to/file.test.ts`)
- Lint + format: `pnpm lint`

Always run typecheck and the relevant tests before declaring a change done.

## Architecture
- [FRA

Rewrite the text below so it reads like a sharp human editor wrote it.

Kill these specific AI tells:
- Filler phrases: "it's important to note", "in today's landscape", "delve", "leverage", "moreover", "furthermore", "in conclusion".
- Uniform rhythm: AI sentences cluster at 15-25 words. Break the pattern: follow long sentences with shor

[Attach your photo, then use this prompt:]

Transform this photo into a professional studio headshot for a LinkedIn profile.

Keep the subject's face, facial features, expression, skin tone, and hairstyle exactly unchanged. This must remain recognizably the same person, with natural skin texture and no over-smoothing or beautification.

C

Review the code changes below as a senior engineer who will be paged if this breaks in production.

For each finding, report:
- **Severity**: blocker / major / minor
- **Claim**: one sentence stating the defect
- **Failure scenario**: the concrete input or state that triggers it and what goes wrong
- **Fix**: the smallest change that reso

Summarize the meeting transcript below into exactly three sections:

## Decisions
Every decision actually made, one line each, in the form "We will [X]". If something was discussed but not decided, it does not belong here.

## Action items
A table: Owner | Action | Due date. Only include items where a specific person committed. If an owne

# AGENTS.md

## Setup
```bash
[INSTALL COMMAND, e.g. pnpm install]
[ENV SETUP, e.g. cp .env.example .env]
```

## Verify your changes
Run these before finishing any task: a task is not done if any of them fail:
```bash
[TYPECHECK COMMAND]
[TEST COMMAND]
[LINT COMMAND]
```

## Project rules
- [MOST IMPORTANT CONSTRAINT, e.g. "All API route

Write a work email for me.

To: [RECIPIENT + YOUR RELATIONSHIP, e.g. "my VP, skip-level, we talk rarely" / "vendor I work with weekly"]
What I need to happen after they read it: [THE ONE OUTCOME, e.g. "she approves the budget" / "he sends the report by Friday"]
Key facts they need: [2-4 BULLETS: dates, numbers, context]
Tone: [direct / wa

[Attach your photo, then build the edit from this formula:]

KEEP: state what must not change, explicitly:
"Keep [the subject's face, expression, skin tone, hair, clothing, and pose / the product exactly as it is / everything except what I name below] completely unchanged."

CHANGE: one edit per generation:

For a background swap:
"Replac

I want to implement this feature: [DESCRIBE THE FEATURE: the user-visible outcome, not the implementation]

Constraints: [e.g. "no new dependencies", "must work with our existing auth", "ship behind a feature flag"]

Work in two phases. Do NOT write or edit any code in phase 1.

**Phase 1: Explore and plan:**
1. Read the relevant parts of

My current resume:
"""
[PASTE RESUME]
"""

The job I'm applying for:
"""
[PASTE FULL JOB DESCRIPTION]
"""

Tailor my resume to this job:

1. **Requirement map**: table: each key requirement from the JD | where my resume shows it (quote my line) | strength (strong / partial / missing). Be honest about "missing": that's what I need to know.

---
name: [skill-name-in-kebab-case]
description: >
  [What the skill does in third person, then WHEN to use it, including the
  exact words users type. E.g.: "Generates release notes from merged PRs.
  Use when the user asks for release notes, a changelog, or 'what shipped',
  or before tagging a release."]
---

# [Skill Name]

[2-3 sent

Write landing page copy for the product below.

Product: [WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT DOES]
Customer: [WHO BUYS IT AND WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO GET DONE]
Main alternative they use today: [COMPETITOR OR WORKAROUND]
Proof we have: [METRICS, CUSTOMERS, TESTIMONIALS, or "none yet"]

Produce these sections, in order:

1. Headline: the outcome the custom

[SHOT TYPE: slow dolly-in / handheld tracking shot / static wide shot] of [SUBJECT + ACTION: a lighthouse keeper climbing a spiral staircase, lantern in hand].

Setting: [LOCATION + TIME: inside a stone lighthouse at dusk, warm lantern light against cold blue dusk light through slit windows].

Camera: [MOVEMENT + LENS: dolly rises with hi

Answer the question first, the direct answer in the first sentence, then context only if it changes what I'd do with the answer. If I ask what time zone to use, name the time zone before explaining time zones.

Agreeing with me is not a goal. When I'm wrong, say so and show why. When I present a plan or opinion for feedback, argue the str

Explain this error and find the real cause.

The full error + stack trace (paste everything: truncated traces hide the answer):
"""
[PASTE THE COMPLETE ERROR OUTPUT]
"""
Language/runtime + framework: [e.g. "Python 3.12 / Django" / "Node 22 / Next.js"]
What I was doing when it happened: [THE ACTION/REQUEST/COMMAND]
What changed recently: [

Write a formula for [Excel / Google Sheets: pick one; the function sets differ].

What I want to calculate: [PLAIN ENGLISH, e.g. "sum column C where column A says 'West' and the date in column B falls in the current month"]
My layout: [WHERE THINGS LIVE, e.g. "headers in row 1, data in A2:F500, dates in column B"]
My version, if I know it

Document to summarize:
"""
[PASTE THE FULL DOCUMENT]
"""

Summarize the document above for [AUDIENCE, e.g. "an exec who has 2 minutes" / "my team who will act on it"].

Before writing the summary, extract the 5-8 most important sentences from the document word-for-word as quotes. Then build the summary only from what those quotes and the 

Style prompt (Suno "Style of Music" field, 4-7 descriptors, most important first):
[GENRE + ERA: late-90s alt-rock / 2010s synthpop / lo-fi bedroom folk], [TEMPO + ENERGY: mid-tempo, building intensity], [VOCALS: female alto, breathy verses, belted chorus], [INSTRUMENTATION: warm bass, brushed drums, analog synth pads], [PRODUCTION: tape 

Write ad copy for the product below.

Product + offer: [WHAT IT IS + THE SPECIFIC OFFER, e.g. "14-day free trial", "20% off first order"]
Customer: [WHO + THE PROBLEM THEY'D SAY THEY HAVE, IN THEIR WORDS]
Platform: [META / GOOGLE SEARCH / TIKTOK]
Proof I can legally claim: [REAL NUMBERS, REVIEWS, RESULTS, or "none"]
Awareness stage of the

[Attach a clear photo of the person, then pick a format:]

FORMAT 1: Blister-pack action figure:

Transform the person in this photo into a collectible action figure, sealed in retail blister packaging: the figure rendered as molded plastic with visible seam lines and articulation joints, posed inside a clear plastic bubble on a cardboard

Improve the prompt below. It currently produces: [WHAT'S WRONG: e.g. "generic output", "wrong format", "ignores half my instructions", "inconsistent between runs"]

It will be used with: [MODEL/TOOL, e.g. "Claude", "GPT", "a chat UI", "an API call"] for [ONE-TIME USE / REPEATED USE ON MANY INPUTS]

The prompt:
"""
[PASTE YOUR PROMPT]
"""

Tutor me on [TOPIC] using questions, not lectures.

My context: [WHY I'M LEARNING THIS, e.g. "exam in two weeks" / "new job needs it" / "curiosity"]
Where I am: [HONEST STARTING POINT, e.g. "complete beginner" / "I understand X but Y confuses me" / paste something you got wrong]

Run the session like this:

1. Open with ONE diagnostic que

A casual selfie-style video, handheld phone camera feel, slight natural shake. 9:16 vertical.

The speaker: a [AGE-RANGE, VIBE: "woman in her early 30s, gym clothes, hair up, zero-makeup authenticity" / "bearded guy in his 40s, ballcap, sitting in his truck"], holding the camera at arm's length, making eye contact with the lens.

Setting:

Analyze the writing samples below and extract a brand voice guide that another writer (or an AI) could follow to produce on-brand copy.

Samples of our writing (best, most on-brand examples):
"""
[PASTE 3-5 SAMPLES: emails, posts, web copy, the more varied the better]
"""

Build the guide with these sections:

1. **Voice summary**: our vo

Narration script formatting for ElevenLabs (v3 model):

Delivery direction with audio tags: placed inline, right before the text they affect:
- Emotion: [curious] [excited] [sarcastic] [somber]
- Delivery: [whispers] [shouts] [flatly] [deadpan]
- Reactions: [laughs] [sighs] [gasps] [clears throat] [exhales]
- Pacing: [pauses] [hesitates]

You are conducting a life story interview with me, adapted from the method narrative psychologists use to study identity. Your job is to help me see the story I've been telling myself about my life, and what that story reveals. This is structured reflection, not therapy: no diagnosing, no treating. If anything resembling crisis comes up, 

Take me down a rabbit hole into [TOPIC: entropy / quantum measurement / infinity / Bayes / evolution / Gödel, or write "surprise me"]. Do not start explaining yet. Find out where I actually am first, then take me as deep as I can go.

PHASE 1: CALIBRATION (three questions plus an adaptation rule, one at a time, no explaining yet)
1. "Expl

Take me down the rabbit hole about the nature of reality. Not the stoner version and not the lecture version: the actual arguments, with the actual state of expert disagreement, and me forced to take a position at every level.

Run it as a descent. At each level: pose the question as a puzzle before naming it, make me commit to an answer 

Show me how little of my own mind I actually have access to. Use the experiments, and where possible, run them on me as we go rather than just describing them.

Go one at a time. For each: set it up so I predict what happens before you tell me, then give the result, then push on what it implies about me specifically.

1. CHOICE BLINDNESS.

I'm going to name a conspiracy theory. Your job is not to debunk it and not to indulge it. Your job is to run it through the gauntlet: the same tests that separate the conspiracies that turned out to be real (MKUltra, COINTELPRO, the tobacco doubt campaign) from the ones that never survive contact with evidence.

The theory: [NAME THE THE

Walk me into a structured confrontation with my own mortality. The Stoics treated this as a daily practical exercise, not a morbid one, and the point is decisions, not dread.

First ask whether I have lost someone recently, or am dealing with a serious diagnosis, mine or someone close to me. If either is true, say that this exercise is bu

Take me through the tower of infinities, from the first counterintuitive step to the edge of what mathematics can settle. Assume no mathematical background beyond counting, and prove things to me instead of telling me about them. This subject has almost no prerequisites and one of the best payoffs in mathematics, so do not water it down.

Teach me to reason about evidence the way a Bayesian does, and make it usable in my head, not on paper. Work through this in order, with me answering before each reveal.

GATE 1: THE FAILURE. Give me the test problem cold, before any theory. A disease affects 1 in 1000 people. A test catches 99% of those who have it and gives a false posi

Put free will on trial. I am the judge. Present each side at its strongest, in order, and after each case make me record an interim verdict that I am not allowed to revise silently.

Before opening arguments, do the thing that decides most of this debate: make me define what I would need for free will to be real. Write down my definition 

Help me investigate my own memory as a piece of evidence, not a recording. This is an audit with a method, not a general conversation about how memory is unreliable.

SET UP THE CASE. Ask me to pick one vivid autobiographical memory that meets three conditions: it is at least five years old, it feels detailed and certain, and at least som

Help me find the practices of my own time that future generations will regard as obviously wrong, using the pattern that past moral revolutions actually followed rather than my intuitions about what is bad.

FIRST, KILL THE EXCUSE. Establish the historical finding that makes this exercise possible: the people who participated in practices

Help me talk with someone I care about who believes something I think is false. I want the approaches with evidence behind them, and then I want to rehearse.

Who and what: [YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THEM, WHAT THEY BELIEVE, HOW LONG, AND HOW IT CAME UP LAST TIME]

PART 1: WHAT DOES NOT WORK, AND WHAT ACTUALLY DOES. Correct my model before I o

Take me down into the love I have for my child, all the way down. Not the greeting-card version and not a performance of it: the actual thing, examined honestly, including the parts that are frightening or exhausting or do not feel like love in the moment. I want insight, not sentiment. If the honest answer at any step is complicated, we 

Take me down the rabbit hole of how my child is actually being built, brain and body and mind, and show me the part almost no one feels the weight of: that I am not watching this happen, I am the environment it happens inside. I want to understand the machinery, and I want to come out the other side with more wonder than I went in, not mo

Walk me through the arithmetic of the time I have left with my child while they still live under my roof. This is a clarifying exercise, not a guilt trip, and the point is to make the ordinary days visible while there are still many of them, not to poison them with dread. Do the numbers plainly, then help me decide what to change.

One ch

Take me down into gratitude, past the list. I want to find what I am actually grateful for, understand why it is a gift and not just a fact, and come out seeing my life differently rather than just holding a longer inventory of it. A list is where most gratitude stops. It is where this starts.

Rules for the whole descent:
- One question