Best PromptsThe Deep Future Descent
Fall floor by floor through the far future: the next century, the Kardashev scale, the Fermi paradox, and the last stars, with real probabilities throughout.
Take me down the deepest rabbit hole there is: the future of everything. Descend floor by floor, from tomorrow to the end of time. At each floor: what serious thinkers believe happens there, where they disagree, and one question that makes me commit to a position before we drop further. Before we start, calibrate on me: ask me three quick questions to find out what I already believe about AI progress, humanity's odds, and whether we're alone. Use my answers to decide where to linger. The floors: FLOOR 1: THE NEXT 25 YEARS. AI trajectories, honestly framed: walk me through the actual spectrum of informed opinion, from rapid-takeoff forecasts to the researchers who expect plateaus, and be precise about where the disagreement sits, which is less about whether capabilities improve than about timelines, deployment bottlenecks, and what would even count as the milestone. Then make me put a number and a date on one concrete claim. FLOOR 2: THE NEXT CENTURY. Existential risk, seriously: which risks researchers actually rank highest and by how much, which ones the public overrates relative to the specialists, what Toby Ord's roughly 1 in 6 estimate for this century would mean if taken literally, and the strongest case that such estimates are inflated or close to meaningless. Ask me for my own number and my reasoning before you give me his. FLOOR 3: THE NEXT 10,000 YEARS. If we make it: the Kardashev scale (we're roughly a 0.7), what a Type I civilization actually requires, Dyson swarms as engineering, not fiction, and why "will we recognize our descendants" is the real question. One fork here: ask me whether I think we spread or stay, and why. FLOOR 4: EVERYBODY ELSE. The Fermi paradox floor: the paradox stated properly, then the live solutions: Great Filter (behind us or ahead?), rare Earth, the zoo hypothesis, "Dissolving the Fermi Paradox" (why the silence may not be surprising at all), and grabby aliens (why not seeing anyone might itself be the data). Explain why finding microbes on Mars could be terrible news. Make me pick my filter and defend it. FLOOR 5: THE LONG DARK. Deep time: the last star forming, black hole evaporation, heat death versus other endings, and what it does to the word "late" once I understand that star formation winds down after something like a hundred trillion years, a thin opening slice of the dark eras that follow it. End the tour here, in the dark: one short paragraph, no consolation. THE SURFACING. Collect the numbers I gave at each floor and turn them into one falsifiable sentence about how I should actually be spending my attention. Show me where my own probabilities fight each other: if I gave existential risk a high number AND said the Great Filter is behind us, those two cannot both be comfortable. Then tell me which single number, if I revised it, would change the most about the rest of my answers. Rules: distinguish established science, informed speculation, and philosophy at every floor, and label which is which. Argue the case for the forecasts you would privately bet against before you criticize them. Numbers over adjectives: "some researchers estimate 1-20%" beats "many worry". Where experts genuinely disagree, present the disagreement as the finding rather than smoothing it into a consensus that doesn't exist.
How to use
Budget an evening and answer every commit-before-you-drop question with an actual number, because those numbers are the raw material the final surfacing works on. Without them the whole thing collapses into a lecture about space. The floors are built from the serious literature: Ord's The Precipice, the Sandberg, Drexler and Ord paper dissolving the Fermi paradox, Hanson's grabby aliens model, Kardashev's original scale.
More rabbit hole prompts
Take me down into gratitude, past the list. I want to find what I am actually grateful for, understand why it is a gift and not just a fact, and come out seeing my life differently rather than just holding a longer inventory of it. A list is where most gratitude stops. It is where this starts. Rules for the whole descent: - One question
Everything You Were Given
A descent past the gratitude list into what gratitude actually is: what each gift cost, what your life would lack without it, and how much of it you can never repay.
Rabbit Holebeginner
Help me find what I've disowned in myself by examining what I can't stand in other people. The premise, stated plainly so we both know what we're doing: an ordinary dislike is information about the other person, but a reaction out of proportion to the offense is usually information about me. Contempt, disgust, and a specific kind of fasc
The Projection Audit
The traits you can't stand in other people are a map of what you refuse to see in yourself. This walks the map, using your own irritations as data.
Rabbit Holeintermediate
Audit my hidden motives using signaling theory: the argument that much human behavior is about advertising qualities to other people, and that we hide this from ourselves precisely so we can advertise more convincingly. The logic to apply, so your analysis has teeth instead of being cynicism for its own sake: a self-deceived signaler is
The Reason and the Real Reason
Most of what you do has a stated reason and a real one. Signaling theory turned on your own purchases, arguments, and donations to find the gap.
Rabbit Holeadvanced