Finishing a Branch Skill
The end-of-branch ritual: verify the full test suite is green, detect the worktree situation, then present integration options instead of assuming a merge.
--- name: finishing-a-development-branch description: Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work --- # Finishing a Development Branch ## Overview **Core principle:** Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up. **Announce at start:** "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work." ## Step 1: Verify Tests Run the project's full test suite (`npm test` / `cargo test` / `pytest` / `go test ./...`). **If tests fail**, report the failures and stop: the menu comes after a green suite: ``` Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing: [Show failures] ``` **If tests pass:** continue to Step 2. ## Step 2: Detect Environment ```bash GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P) GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P) # Capture now, while still inside the workspace: Step 5 changes directory # before cleanup (Step 6) needs this value WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) ``` This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works: | State | Menu | Cleanup | |-------|------|---------| | `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON` (normal repo) | Standard 3 options | No worktree to clean up | | `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON`, named branch | Standard 3 options | Provenance-based (see Step 6) | | `GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON`, detached HEAD | Reduced 2 options (no merge) | Externally managed: leave in place | ## Step 3: Determine Base Branch The base branch is whatever this work forked from, usually named in the plan, the conversation, or the branch's upstream. If it is not already known, ask: "This branch split from <your best guess> - is that correct?" Confirm before merging: merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo. ## Step 4: Present Options **Normal repo and named-branch worktree: present exactly these 3 options:** ``` Implementation complete. What would you like to do? 1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally 2. Push and create a Pull Request 3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later) Which option? ``` **Detached HEAD: present exactly these 2 options:** ``` Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace). 1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request 2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later) Which option? ``` Present the menu exactly as written: concise, with every option coming from the list above. Discarding the work happens only in response to your human partner explicitly asking for it (see "If your human partner asks to discard the work" below). Wait for their answer; the integration decision is theirs. ## Step 5: Execute Choice ### Option 1: Merge Locally ```bash # Get main repo root for CWD safety MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel) cd "$MAIN_ROOT" # Merge first: verify success before removing anything git checkout <base-branch> git pull git merge <feature-branch> # Verify tests on merged result <test command> ``` If tests fail on the merged result: stop, leave the worktree and branch in place, and investigate: nothing has been pushed, so the merge is local and recoverable. Once the merged result is green: clean up the worktree (Step 6), then delete the branch: ```bash git branch -d <feature-branch> ``` ### Option 2: Push and Create PR ```bash git push -u origin <feature-branch> # From a detached HEAD, name the new branch on the remote: # git push origin HEAD:refs/heads/<new-branch> ``` Then create the pull/merge request against <base-branch> with the forge's tooling: its CLI if one is available, or the creation URL most forges print when you push: following the repo's PR template and conventions if present, and report the URL to your human partner. Keep the worktree: your human partner iterates on PR feedback there. ### Option 3: Keep As-Is Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>." ### If your human partner asks to discard the work This path exists only as a response to an explicit request to throw the work away. Confirm first: ``` This will permanently delete: - Branch <name> - All commits: <commit-list> - Worktree at <path> Type 'discard' to confirm. ``` Wait for that exact confirmation. When it arrives: ```bash MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel) cd "$MAIN_ROOT" ``` Then clean up the worktree (Step 6) and force-delete the branch: ```bash git branch -D <feature-branch> ``` ## Step 6: Cleanup Workspace **Runs for Option 1 and confirmed discards.** Options 2 and 3 always preserve the worktree. Both callers have already changed directory to the main repo root (worktree removal must run from outside the worktree) and use the `GIT_DIR`/`GIT_COMMON`/`WORKTREE_PATH` values captured in Step 2, from before that directory change. **If `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON`:** Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done. **If `WORKTREE_PATH` is under `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/`:** Superpowers created this worktree. We own cleanup: ```bash git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH" git worktree prune # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations ``` **Otherwise:** The host environment owns this workspace, leave it in place. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it. ## Quick Reference | Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch | |--------|-------|------|---------------|----------------| | 1. Merge locally | yes | - | - | yes | | 2. Create PR | - | yes | yes | - | | 3. Keep as-is | - | - | yes | - | | Discard (explicit request only) | - | - | - | yes (force) | ## Common Rationalizations | Excuse | Reality | |--------|---------| | "Tests passed earlier this session" | Run the suite on the tree you are about to integrate. A green run only proves the tree it ran on. | | "They obviously want it merged" | Integration is your human partner's decision. Present the menu and wait. | | "They seem done with this feature: I'll offer to discard it" | The menu is complete as written. Discard happens only when your human partner asks for it in so many words. | | "'Yeah, get rid of it' counts as confirmation" | Only the typed word `discard` authorizes deletion. | | "The PR is up, so the worktree is clutter now" | PR feedback gets fixed in that worktree. It stays until the work lands. | | "This other worktree looks stale: I'll clean it too" | Clean up only worktrees under `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/`. Everything else belongs to the host. | | "The merged-result failure is probably flaky" | A failing merged result stops everything. Branch and worktree stay put while you investigate. | | "The base branch is obviously main" | Confirm the fork point or ask. Merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo. | | "The push was rejected: force-push will fix it" | A rejected push means the remote moved. Investigate; force-push only on your human partner's explicit request. |
How to use
Encodes the discipline everyone skips at the finish line: no integration menu until the suite is green, and cleanup logic that depends on how the workspace came to exist (normal repo, named-branch worktree, or externally managed detached HEAD). Pairs with using-git-worktrees, which sets up exactly what this skill tears down. Save as .claude/skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.md, or install the full MIT-licensed Superpowers plugin (github.com/obra/superpowers) with '/plugin install superpowers@claude-plugins-official'.
More skill prompts
--- name: writing-documentation description: Write or update documentation from the code. Use when the user asks for a README, API reference, guide, docstrings, or says the docs are out of date. --- # Writing Documentation Documentation is a claim about behavior. Every claim must be checked against the code before it ships, because a wrSKILL.md
Documentation Skill
A skill that documents what the code does rather than what it should do: read first, examples from tests, unverifiable claims marked.
--- name: security-review description: Review code for security defects. Use before merging changes that touch authentication, authorization, user input, file handling, secrets, or external requests, or when the user asks for a security review. --- # Security Review Find defects an attacker could actually use. A finding without an attacSKILL.md
Security Review Skill
A skill that reviews changes for exploitable defects, follows untrusted input to where it lands, and reports only findings with an attack path.
--- name: accessibility-review description: Audit UI code for accessibility defects against WCAG. Use when building or changing components, forms, modals, or navigation, or when the user asks about accessibility, a11y, screen readers, or keyboard support. --- # Accessibility Review Judge the interface by whether a person can complete thSKILL.md
Accessibility Skill
A skill that audits UI against WCAG by keyboard, semantics, and state, reporting who is blocked rather than listing rule numbers.