Verification Before Completion Skill
The gate that forbids 'tests pass', 'fixed', or even 'Done!' without fresh command output proving it: claim-to-evidence table and rationalization counters.
---
name: verification-before-completion
description: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
---
# Verification Before Completion
## Overview
**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.
**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**
## The Iron Law
```
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
```
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
## The Gate Function
```
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
```
## Common Failures
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|-------|----------|----------------|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
## Red Flags - STOP
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**
## Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
|--------|---------|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
## Key Patterns
**Tests:**
```
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
```
**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**
```
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
```
**Build:**
```
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
```
**Requirements:**
```
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
```
**Agent delegation:**
```
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
```
## When To Apply
**ALWAYS before:**
- ANY variation of success/completion claims
- ANY expression of satisfaction
- ANY positive statement about work state
- Committing, PR creation, task completion
- Moving to next task
- Delegating to agents
**Rule applies to:**
- Exact phrases
- Paraphrases and synonyms
- Implications of success
- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctnessHow to use
Arguably the highest-value 120 lines in the set: it targets 'should work now' (the failure mode every agent user has been burned by) with a five-step gate between finishing work and claiming it's finished. Fully standalone and composes with any workflow. The claim-to-evidence table doubles as a checklist for reviewing an agent's own completion reports. Save as .claude/skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.md, or install the full MIT-licensed Superpowers plugin (github.com/obra/superpowers) with '/plugin install superpowers@claude-plugins-official'.
More skill prompts
--- name: writing-documentation description: Write or update documentation from the code. Use when the user asks for a README, API reference, guide, docstrings, or says the docs are out of date. --- # Writing Documentation Documentation is a claim about behavior. Every claim must be checked against the code before it ships, because a wrSKILL.md
Documentation Skill
A skill that documents what the code does rather than what it should do: read first, examples from tests, unverifiable claims marked.
--- name: security-review description: Review code for security defects. Use before merging changes that touch authentication, authorization, user input, file handling, secrets, or external requests, or when the user asks for a security review. --- # Security Review Find defects an attacker could actually use. A finding without an attacSKILL.md
Security Review Skill
A skill that reviews changes for exploitable defects, follows untrusted input to where it lands, and reports only findings with an attack path.
--- name: accessibility-review description: Audit UI code for accessibility defects against WCAG. Use when building or changing components, forms, modals, or navigation, or when the user asks about accessibility, a11y, screen readers, or keyboard support. --- # Accessibility Review Judge the interface by whether a person can complete thSKILL.md
Accessibility Skill
A skill that audits UI against WCAG by keyboard, semantics, and state, reporting who is blocked rather than listing rule numbers.