B2B White Paper

Draft a 6-10 page B2B white paper: problem-evidence-solution structure, skimmable by headline, real data slots, and the pitch confined to the end.

Draft a white paper.

Working topic + the argument it makes: [THE THESIS, e.g. "mid-market teams overpay for observability because pricing models punish scale"]
Reader: [ROLE + WHERE THEY ARE IN THE BUYING JOURNEY: "evaluating approaches" / "building the business case"]
What we sell + how the paper should relate to it: [YOUR PRODUCT: the paper educates; the pitch stays in the last section]
Evidence we actually have:
"""
[YOUR DATA, CUSTOMER RESULTS, SURVEY NUMBERS, BENCHMARKS, or "little, tell me what evidence would make this credible"]
"""
Target: 2,500-4,000 words (6-10 designed pages; buyers consistently say under 10 pages; longer is a different asset).

Structure:
1. **Title**: states the value/finding, not the topic: "The Hidden Cost of X: [finding]" beats "A Guide to X".
2. **Executive summary**: the full argument in 150-200 words, readable standalone; many buyers read nothing else, so it carries the thesis AND the key numbers.
3. **The problem**: sized and evidenced. Every stat slot filled either from my evidence or marked [DATA NEEDED: what stat + where to find it]. Never invent a statistic: one fake number discredits the whole paper.
4. **Why current approaches fall short**: fair to the alternatives; strawmen read as marketing and kill trust.
5. **The better approach**: the framework/methodology, explained vendor-neutrally. This is the section readers keep.
6. **Evidence it works**: my case studies/data, or clearly-marked slots for them.
7. **Recommendations + one CTA**: practical next steps a reader can take regardless of buying, then the single product-relevant call to action. The pitch lives here and only here: roughly 80% education, 20% product is the ratio that keeps credibility.

Skimmability rules: descriptive section headlines that carry the argument by themselves (reading only the headlines = the executive summary), a [PULL QUOTE] or [CHART: what it shows] marker per major section, bulleted takeaways at each section's end, no paragraph over 4 sentences.

Also produce: the gating recommendation for this asset (gate it, ungate it, or hybrid ungated-summary + gated-PDF) with one line of reasoning, and 3 title options ranked.
Originated fromStan SedberryUpdated
Blog postsintermediate

More writing prompts

Rewrite the text below in plain language for [AUDIENCE, e.g. "patients with no medical background" / "customers reading a policy update" / "new hires on day one"].

Target reading level: [e.g. "8th grade" / "as simple as the content allows"].

How to rewrite:
- Lead with what the reader must DO or what happens to them. Background comes af

Plain Language Rewrite

Rewrite dense policy, legal, medical, or technical text at a target reading level without losing a single obligation or number.

Writingbeginner
Write a comparison article for the query: [e.g. "Notion vs Obsidian" / "best Mailchimp alternatives"].

Options to compare: [LIST 2-8 OPTIONS]
Who is searching this: [READER + WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO DECIDE]
My relationship to these products: [e.g. "I make one of them" / "I use two of them daily" / "none, I am researching"]
Facts I can su

Comparison Article

Write an honest X vs Y or best alternatives article: real differentiators, a decision table, and a clear pick for each type of reader.

Writingintermediate
Build an FAQ page for [PRODUCT/SERVICE/TOPIC].

Real questions people ask me:
"""
[PASTE SUPPORT TICKETS, SALES CALL NOTES, SEARCH QUERIES, OR COMMENTS. RAW IS FINE.]
"""

Facts I can state as true: [PRICING, POLICIES, LIMITS, TIMELINES]

Do this:
1. **Cluster** the raw questions into distinct questions people actually ask. Merge duplicat

FAQ Page From Real Questions

Turn support tickets and sales objections into an FAQ page that answers in the first sentence and is structured for AI search engines.

Writingbeginner

Search prompts

Find a prompt by title, description, tag, or category.