YouTube Metadata Pack
Generate ranked title options, a search-optimized description, and accurate timestamp chapters from a transcript or outline.
Create the metadata package for this YouTube video. Video transcript or outline: """ [PASTE TRANSCRIPT WITH TIMESTAMPS IF YOU HAVE THEM, OR THE OUTLINE] """ Channel and audience: [WHO WATCHES, WHAT THEY EXPECT FROM YOU] What someone would search to find this: [1-3 PHRASES, OR "you tell me"] Produce: 1. **Titles**: 8 options under 60 characters, ranked. Mix these angles: the direct search phrase, the specific outcome, the number or timeframe, and the counterintuitive claim. Every title must be a promise the video actually keeps. Say in one line why the top pick wins. 2. **Description**: - First 2 lines (about 150 characters): what the viewer gets and why to keep watching. This is all that shows before "more". - Then 100-200 words describing the video in natural sentences that use the search phrases the way a person would say them. - Then a placeholder block for links, and a short line for the call to action. 3. **Chapters**: timestamps starting at 00:00, each label 2-5 words, one per genuine topic shift. Base every timestamp on the transcript. If the transcript has no timestamps, output chapter labels with [TIMESTAMP] placeholders instead of estimating times. 4. **Tags**: 10-15, ordered most to least relevant. 5. **Pinned comment**: one question that invites a specific answer, not "what do you think?". Rules: use only what is in the transcript. Do not promise anything in the title or description that the video does not deliver, since the retention drop from a mismatched title costs more than the extra clicks earn.
How to use
Feed it the real transcript, not a summary: chapters generated from a summary drift by 20 or 30 seconds and viewers notice immediately. The timestamp guardrail matters because models will confidently invent plausible times from an outline. Test the top two titles as a thumbnail pair rather than trusting the ranking, and remember that the title and thumbnail have to work together, so pick the title that leaves the thumbnail something to say.
More writing prompts
Rewrite the text below in plain language for [AUDIENCE, e.g. "patients with no medical background" / "customers reading a policy update" / "new hires on day one"]. Target reading level: [e.g. "8th grade" / "as simple as the content allows"]. How to rewrite: - Lead with what the reader must DO or what happens to them. Background comes af
Plain Language Rewrite
Rewrite dense policy, legal, medical, or technical text at a target reading level without losing a single obligation or number.
Write a comparison article for the query: [e.g. "Notion vs Obsidian" / "best Mailchimp alternatives"]. Options to compare: [LIST 2-8 OPTIONS] Who is searching this: [READER + WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO DECIDE] My relationship to these products: [e.g. "I make one of them" / "I use two of them daily" / "none, I am researching"] Facts I can su
Comparison Article
Write an honest X vs Y or best alternatives article: real differentiators, a decision table, and a clear pick for each type of reader.
Build an FAQ page for [PRODUCT/SERVICE/TOPIC]. Real questions people ask me: """ [PASTE SUPPORT TICKETS, SALES CALL NOTES, SEARCH QUERIES, OR COMMENTS. RAW IS FINE.] """ Facts I can state as true: [PRICING, POLICIES, LIMITS, TIMELINES] Do this: 1. **Cluster** the raw questions into distinct questions people actually ask. Merge duplicat
FAQ Page From Real Questions
Turn support tickets and sales objections into an FAQ page that answers in the first sentence and is structured for AI search engines.